We are living in an era of collective exhaustion. You feel it when you scroll through the news, when you check the price of your monthly groceries, or when you read about another tech giant laying off thousands of employees while simultaneously posting record-breaking quarterly profits. The current operating system of our global economy is glitching. It is designed to extract value from the many and funnel it to the few. In business school, we call this “maximizing shareholder value.” In reality, it is a slow-motion collapse of social cohesion.
We are often told there is no alternative—that to have modern medicine, global logistics, and high-speed internet, we must accept a world where oligarchs own more wealth than entire nations. This is a lie.
Living in Bologna, Italy, I see a working alternative every day. In the region of Emilia-Romagna, roughly a third of the GDP is generated not by standard corporations, but by cooperatives. This isn’t a utopian fantasy; it’s a proven, billion-dollar economic engine that has sustained this region through financial crises that devastated the rest of the world. But it is an engine that needs a 21st-century update. By applying a “Solarpunk” philosophy—upgrading traditional solidarity with modern transparency and decentralized technology—we might just find the cure for corporate greed.
The Italian Job: A Crash Course in Economic DNA
To understand the future, we must look at the industrial landscape of Northern Italy. Here, a cooperative is not just a small-scale organic grocery store where members volunteer on weekends. We are talking about massive construction firms, vast logistics fleets, high-end manufacturing plants, and sophisticated social care networks.
The fundamental difference lies in the company’s “Source Code.” In a standard capitalist corporation, the sole legal purpose is to maximize profit for external shareholders. If burning down a rainforest or automating ten thousand families out of their livelihoods increases the stock price by two percent, the CEO is practically incentivized (if not legally pressured) to strike the match.
In an Italian cooperative, the workers, the providers, or the customers are the owners. There are no external shareholders demanding blood for dividends. The purpose is to provide a stable service and a dignified livelihood for the members. This model is protected by two fascinating legal mechanisms that act as a structural firewall against greed:
- The Solidarity Contribution: By law, every cooperative must pay 3% of its annual profits into a national fund. This fund is used exclusively to seed new cooperatives or to intervene and save existing ones that are facing financial hardship. It is a self-replicating cycle of solidarity that ensures the movement grows even in lean years.
- Indivisible Reserves: This is the “magic trick” of the Italian system. A massive chunk of profits (often over 70%) must be reinvested back into the company’s reserves. These reserves cannot be touched or distributed as dividends, even if the company dissolves. The money belongs to the company’s future and to the next generation of workers. It removes the temptation to strip-mine the business for short-term cash, as the members know the wealth remains in the “collective pockets” of the enterprise.
It Is Not Communism (Calm Down, America)
Whenever I discuss this model with international colleagues, the “C-word” inevitably surfaces. Let’s be clear: this is not communism. Communism, in its historical application, relies on a state-controlled command economy that kills innovation and ignores market signals.
The Italian cooperative model is fully market-based. These companies compete on the open market, bid on international contracts, and must be efficient to survive. The difference is strictly about the direction of the profit flow. In a traditional corporation, profit goes to capital (investors who may never have seen the factory floor). In a cooperative, profit goes to labor (the people doing the work). It is the democratization of enterprise; a system that rewards effort and participation rather than passive ownership.
Case Study: From Amazon to “The Hive”
Let’s make this concrete. Imagine a world where a logistics giant like Amazon is replaced by a federation of worker-owned cooperatives: let’s call it The Hive.
In our current reality, Amazon pushes warehouse workers to the brink of physical collapse to shave seconds off delivery times. Why? Because every second saved is a penny earned for Wall Street. The algorithm fires people automatically; the human element is a cost center to be minimized. All this suffering exists so that a chart on a screen goes up and one man can build a rocket ship.
Now look at The Hive. The workers own The Hive. They vote on the board of directors. They decide the pace of work. Would they vote to track their own bathroom breaks with a draconian algorithm? Most certainly not. They would vote for a system that balances operational efficiency with human dignity.
Without the pressure for infinite, compounding quarterly growth, The Hive doesn’t need to sell you a new toaster every year via planned obsolescence. They can focus on quality. Instead of one man amassing 200 billion dollars, those gains are distributed among the workforce. 200,000 families gain a secure financial future, and that money circulates locally and thereby supporting neighborhood bakeries, independent artists, and local schools. When wealth is distributed, it creates a vibrant ecosystem; when it is hoarded, it creates a desert.
The Environmental Impact of “Enough”
Our current corporate structure is an environmental suicide pact. Publicly traded companies must grow to be considered “healthy.” If Apple sells the same number of iPhones this year as they did last year, the market considers them a failure. This mandates a culture of waste.
A cooperative, however, has the luxury of saying “enough.” If a worker-owned cooperative manufactures washing machines, their incentive is to build the longest-lasting, most repairable product possible. They don’t want a machine that breaks in three years, because they are the owners who would have to fix it or bear the environmental cost in their own community.
Furthermore, the feedback loop is closed. In a major conglomerate, a distant board of directors in a glass tower may ignore local pollution for the sake of the balance sheet. In a cooperative, the decision-makers live in the same town as the factory. They won’t vote to dump chemicals in the river where their own children swim. This is where the Solarpunk aesthetic—harmony between technology, nature, and society—becomes a hard-coded economic reality.
The Shadows in the Sun: A Need for Transparency
We must be honest: the Italian model is not a flawless paradise. Human corruption is a constant variable. The reality in Italy is often marred by:
- “Cooperative Spurie” (Fake Co-ops): Unscrupulous business owners who create shell cooperatives to exploit tax breaks and hire “members” who have no real power or voting rights.
- Opacity: Traditional paper-based accounting and closed-door meetings can allow for mismanagement or even infiltration by organized crime. Italy’s mafia is famous for that after all.
- Inefficiency: One of the main criticisms of cooperatives is that democracy is slow. “Death by meeting” can hinder a company’s ability to pivot in a fast-moving market.
The Solarpunk Upgrade: Technology as a Disinfectant
This is where we move from history to the future. We can solve the structural problems of the Italian model by integrating 21st-century technology—creating the “Solarpunk Cooperative.”
The answer is radical transparency enforced by code. Imagine the accounting books of The Hive published on a transparent, immutable ledger. Every transaction would be visible to every member in real-time. You cannot hide corruption in a glass house.
We can use digital governance tools to streamline democracy. Liquid democracy allows members to vote on their phones or delegate their votes to trusted peers on specific technical issues. We can have the agility of a Silicon Valley startup with the ethics of an Italian cooperative. Smart contracts can automatically enforce solidarity contributions, ensuring that the 3% social tax is moved by code the moment profit is registered, bypassing any reluctant bureaucracy.
A World Without Giants
The goal of Solarpunk is not to return to a pre-industrial past, but to embrace high technology without high oppression. We can have global logistics and advanced research without multinational conglomerates.
Imagine a network of federated cooperatives: a manufacturing co-op in Germany, a logistics co-op in Italy, and a software co-op in India. They trade and support each other, but wealth spreads out like water in a delta rather than pooling at the top. This solves the crisis of inequality at the source.
When you work for a giant corporation, you are a resource to be exhausted. When you work for a cooperative, you are a citizen of your workplace. You have dignity. You have a voice.
The transition won’t be easy. The current giants will lobby, undercut, and fight to maintain their monopolies. But the narrative of “greed is good” has failed us. We have the blueprint for a better engine; it has been running in the heart of Italy for decades. It just needs a tune-up. It is time to stop waiting for a benevolent billionaire to save us and start building the tables where we can all sit.
***
About the Author
Saskia Karges is a corporate strategist at a Fortune 500 company and a writer based in Bologna, Italy. She explores the intersection of economic resilience, high intelligence, and solarpunk philosophy. Her novel, Amatea—Memoirs of the Last City, launches on February 25, 2026.
Learn more about her work and upcoming release at saskiakarges.carrd.co.
